The question, “what are the effects of illiteracy for the civilization” immediately conjures up notions that illiteracy is a problem to be rectified through intensive campaigns of reading and writing development. This essay will propose that there are indeed consequences of illiteracy for civilization based on the driving assumptions that success, development, and progress can only be possible through certain forms of engagement, particularly the skills of literacy.
However, the essay will also propose that illiteracy is not the “problem” it is understood to be; that in fact, illiteracy actually serves these driving assumptions well and thus, it is a necessary aspect of the civilization that is structured in the way that it is.
Additionally, illiteracy and the impetus to eradicate it reveals the deeper issue of the devaluing of other ways of being that are essential to a more cohesive civilization. Such devaluing becomes the platform for the regression, rather than the progression, of civilization which increased literacy can serve to mask, though only for a time.
In other words, the immediate benefits of rectifying illiteracy toward mitigating its immediate effects on civilization are overtaken by the greater consequences of the devaluing of other forms of communication and ways of being that are more effective for promoting civilization. Literacy does not deal with the deeper issues of human social engagement upon which truly great civilization is built. Thus, should everyone be able to read and write, there would still be the economic, well-being, and access to resource disparities that have been identified in the lives of those who are experiencing illiteracy.
In a social construct that values the global over the local, GDP growth over the meeting of peoples’ needs, and “development” as the necessary evidence of good civilization, illiteracy can be a formidable enemy to those who are a part of the civilization. At best, it perpetuates the fallacy of this social construct, and at worst, leads to the exclusion to the margins of those who cannot participate resulting in higher unemployment, lower income, reduced health and limited practices for self-care, as well as disconnectedness which in turn results in (often large) pockets of poverty, dependence, reduced productivity and reduced quality of life, often cycling through generations.
At the same time, it is to the advantage of the civilization formed in this way to have a portion of its population be illiterate as it ensures their local service to the global demand without aspiration for more which would jeopardize the necessary supply and demand balance that keeps this structure functioning.
Illiteracy also ensures the emphasis upon growth and economic development for the financial stakeholders who want the greatest gain for the least possible investment. It is necessary that there be people who can only serve the outcomes which are attractive to these stakeholders rather than participate in them.
Beyond the immediate rewards and consequences to respective individual people, illiteracy and the push to eradicate it reveals a social construct that is rooted in the stronger over the weaker, exploitation of the many for the gain of the few, a readiness to isolate people and exclude other valuable ways of coming together that promote a stronger civilization with a broader portfolio of engagement.
Finally, illiteracy and devaluing of other methods of communication beyond reading and writing, reveal an insidious, though perhaps unconscious, push for what is deemed a more human humanity, i.e. optimal development of the human to ensure the optimal outcomes for the civilization as understood through success, development and progress.
Yet, what of the other, more sustainable aspects of civilization. In pockets where illiteracy is high, there are also skills of communication, resilience and engagement that are oven overlooked as valuable to the progress of civilization. Consider the power of the oral tradition and communication through the arts such as drawings and paintings, stained glass and music that have tied the story of life together with a language that all could understand and act upon. There is significant movement around the world of people flocking to museums and various tourist sites to see the evidences of generations long gone, their way of being incompatible with how we do life today. Yet for many, these evidences speak powerfully about the things that bind us, and our deep longing for cohesiveness and sustainable integration rooted in people rather than systems, structures and the push for predefined and approved outcomes that in the end, only optimally benefit a few.
Today, those that hold the power are those that can manage ever-changing waves of written information. But, can they manage people, relationships, and shared story – the very constants that have remained through every generation of civilization? It is the push to human capital for the purpose of production measured by the economy of money, from the relational capital for the sake of cohesion and shared experience measured by the economy of human dignity and community that has generated the very negative effects that illiteracy reveals and that literacy campaigns believe they can fix.
Thus, the only true effect of illiteracy for civilization is that it readily reveals the limits of the civilization to reach its full potential, particularly when such civilization is structured around success, development and progress. Illiteracy thus serves to reveal the heart of a civilization focused on an economy of outcomes that can only benefit the few, and thus its eradication will only temporarily mitigate the consequences to an individual, and to the civilization.